There was recently an article in my local paper about new “net zero energy” houses being constructed in Orange County, Calif. The headline on the piece referenced the homes being “nearly ready for electric cars.” A conversation with the developer (Herb Gardner of City Ventures) ensued, in which some of the nuances of home charging for electric cars was explored. Now that I am a driver of an electric car (thanks, Nissan, I finally got my Leaf and I love it!), I was intrigued.

I’ve been following the emergence of the viable electric car for some time, looking forward to the day I would drive one. Now that I do drive one (well, share it with my wife actually), I’m pleased with the opportunities it brings me to be an evangelist for more sustainable behaviors. Everybody wants to know about the car, and what it means to own one.

Let’s be clear:  they’re not for everybody. As with many “greener” behaviors, it takes conviction, discipline and planning to make it work. My wife and I took a thorough look at our driving habits before making the leap. I was motivated to get a vehicle that qualified for car pool lane access in California, since the stickers for my Prius expired at the end of June. The Leaf was the best option. (Though I’m able to take heavy rail into the city for work most days, there are times when driving is required, and the commute from my home to my office is punishing without the use of the HOV lanes.) Because it’s 38 miles one way, it was iffy whether the Leaf would make the round trip journey on a single charge. This caused me to sniff around to find available charging stations in a reasonable vicinity of my office. The default location was the downtown Nissan dealer, where I could charge up in a pinch. As it has turned out, I have also started a new job, and there are two charging stations in our parking structure, which were installed just last November! Now my “range anxiety” is abated on those days when it’s necessary to take my car to work—I just charge up at either end of the journey.

The rest of the time, my wife drives it. She very typically travels fewer than 60 miles a day, running errands and seeing clients, which is the perfect application for this car.

We installed a special 240-volt charging station in our garage, which took some cash. But guess what? The California Vehicle Rebate Program found us eligible for an incentive that completely covers the cost.  In addition, my utility company has offered us a special rate for overnight charging, which is what we typically do. (The very clever Leaf has a timer for charging that makes it easy to capitalize on the lowest tier rates, which start at midnight.)

Occasionally we also “top off the tank” in the middle of the day. One would typically want to avoid this because of peak-hour electricity rates, but we are able to generally relax about it because the photovoltaic panels on our roof are cranking out power at that time, so we are generally juicing it ourselves without the utility’s help.

These two items—the charging station and the PV—were what was considered necessary to have a new home “electric car-ready.” Mr. Gardner made the beautiful and very compelling argument that when one buys a home so equipped, one will save a great deal of money on both gasoline and electricity. The cost of these items would just be incorporated into the price of the house.

But “net zero?” That’s a horse of just a slightly different color. To achieve NZE in this example house, more energy would need to be produced than consumed. This is not as difficult as it may seem. With PV, more energy is produced during the day (usually) than the house (and car, in this case) consume, power is fed back into the grid, and the electric meter spins backwards. Then, at night, when rates are lower, the home draws from the grid, but usually at a much lower volume. As long as the excess energy generated during the day that is fed back into the grid is more than what is consumed at night, the property is considered “net zero energy.” The trick is to anticipate the home’s demand and design a PV system that generates enough juice to just barely exceed it. (Even the greenest green might be reluctant to provide any more free power back to the utility than is absolutely necessary.)

I haven’t yet assessed how much juice the Leaf is drawing. I know that I still have space on my roof, and the sun is still shining, so maybe some day in the not-too-distant future, I too will achieve NZE at my house. But wouldn’t it be great to walk right into a house that was good to go in the first place? I believe Mr. Gardner is on to something.

(Daniel Gehman is an associate at Harley Ellis Devereaux in Los Angeles, where he leads the Corporate and Commercial studio. He can be reached at dpgehman@hedev.com.)

As you’ll hear again if you read my Editor’s Note in the November issue of MHN (click here to subscribe), I think the USGBC’s GreenBuild conference and expo is an important event to attend. Skip a year every so often, and take turns attending, because new technologies take a while to evolve. But multifamily companies of all sizes would do well to get there every couple of years to stay abreast of new trends before they hit the mainstream. Have the team member(s) who attend the show present their most compelling products and conference take-aways during an in-house lunch and learn.

As usual GreenBuild 2011, which was held in Toronto last week, featured an overwhelming number of green products (as well as products that want to be perceived as green by keeping company with green products) on the show floor. We’ll be publishing our observations and videos from the show floor soon (click here to read two special reports posted by MHN so far).

In the meantime, here’s a preview of a product that a clever leasing team could use as a conversation starter about their community’s commitment to green living.

Ultra-green LED “task” light exhibited at GreenBuild is made from recycled e-waste.

You can tell prospects that your Heron LED task light is made by LittleFootprint Lighting, a California-based pioneer of sustainably designed LED task lighting products made in the USA from recycled materials, including plastic from e-waste. In fact, LittleFootprint Lighting is so green that it announced during GreenBuild its official designation as an “e-Stewards Enterprise.” LittleFootprint Lighting is the first e-Stewards Enterprise that actually makes products from recycled e-waste, “closing the loop” on plastics from e-waste.

“At this pivotal moment in the worldwide e-waste crisis, LittleFootprint Lighting joins a growing number of business, academic and governmental leaders taking action to stem a toxic tide,” said Jim Puckett, executive director of the Basel Action Network, creator of the e-Stewards program.

E-waste is the fastest growing element of the U.S. garbage stream. According to a report in Time Magazine, Americans throw out more than 350,000 cell phones and 130,000 computers every day. Improperly disposed-of lead, mercury and other toxic materials found inside e-waste can leak from landfills and pollute our communities.

I’ve just returned from a two-day sustainability brainstorming session hosted by Interface, where I had the pleasure of meeting some of the industry’s most intriguing people. Though my mind is overwhelmed with trying to synthesize everything we discussed into just one thought, what I can say is that our industry needs to become more innovative.

Now before you shoot off an angry email, let me explain. The multifamily industry, as a whole, seems to be—unfortunately—known for its sluggishness to adopt new technologies. But the problem (well, maybe not a problem, per se) is that the need for multifamily housing is never going to disappear; in fact, it will only continue to grow as both our millennial population moves into the workforce and out of mom and dad’s and our baby boomer generation begins to downsize and acknowledge that the urban center is where they want to be. And these renters are not going to tolerate apartments of the past.

What’s the solution? Well, I’d love to say that after 48 hours chewing on this problem (and others that I’ll explore later), we came up with the answer. But alas, we only scratched the surface. As one member of this gathering pointed out, though, green needs to be “sexy” to the consumer; it needs to be easy, affordable and cool. Despite our best intentions, perhaps the green factor should not be the differentiator; rather, the product, the apartment, whatever you’re selling, needs to have a unique story to tell besides the fact that it’s green. That’s the way most people will get on board. Maybe green is almost beside the point.

One of the groups’ brainstorming led them to create a modular, intergenerational city (constructed with art materials provided). Both the city components and the housing units could be interchanged, with the end result being a community where residents aren’t constantly turning over.

We closed our meeting trying to stretch our imaginations for the future. What will truly be innovative? We broke into groups to figure this out, and the group I was a part of decided to take modular housing to the next step. What if an entire mixed-use development was modular and intergenerational? Rather than an apartment being a stepping-stone, why not make it a permanent home that grows (and shrinks) with you and your family? Incorporate all amenities necessary for children, in-laws and empty nesters within the community.

Now this such example was just one group’s idea, but it was an idea that sprang from instructions not to limit ourselves. If the industry stops imposing such limits on itself, what could we come up with next? (I understand financing plays a tremendous role in this, but please bear with me.) I’d love to hear your thoughts on the matter. Leave a comment here or email me at eschnitzer@multi-housingnews.com.

My excellent colleague Natasha Selhi passed along some interesting information from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this morning.

The EPA wants renters to know that, much like single family homeowners, they do have control over how green their apartment homes are; in fact, they can express their dissatisfaction with a current apartment community by moving to another.

According to EPA, “A common misconception is that renters have little control over the environmental impacts of their homes. The truth is that renters can influence many environmental aspects of their housing, from choosing where they live to adopting everyday practices that save energy and water.”

EPA has devised a checklist to help select a greener rental house or apartment, as well as to reduce bills and have a healthier and more comfortable indoor environment.

EPA suggests that “before you sign a lease, investigate its green features and quality of its indoor environment. Discuss the considerations [on the checklist] as well as any of your own, with your landlord. If the unit does not meet some of the criteria, use your bargaining power and inquire with the landlord about making some updates.”

How is your apartment community doing with green? And will this EPA checklist help—or hurt—your leasing effort?

It’s graduation season, and last weekend my sister-in-law threw a well-deserved party for our niece Monica who has completed high school. So, as planned, less than 24 hours (!) after I got home from NAA in New Orleans, I packed my overnight bag and we drove the five or so hours up to the Syracuse, NY area.

A highlight of my socializing with friends and family was the discovery that just 30 minutes away from my sister-in-law is a working wind farm. MHN reports on renewable energy trends, but here was an opportunity to see a real wind farm up close and personal… or at least from the viewing area outside. Located in Madison County, the Fenner Wind Farm produces electricity equivalent to the annual consumption of over 7,800 homes. The farm is owned by Enel North America and comprises 20 GE 1.5 MW wind turbines. It has been in operation since 2001 according to Community Energy whose page I landed on when Googling “Fenner Wind Farm.” Community Energy “leads the development and availability of fuel-free renewable energy with wind and solar power.” Its customers are utilities, businesses, institutions and individuals.

Unfortunately the graduation festivities went on longer than expected and my family vetoed the detour to the Fenner Wind Farm. But here’s a (not very flattering) stock art picture I found.

Even though this isn’t a great picture, I don’t agree that the turbines are ugly; in fact, I think they look quite graceful. What do you think about their appearance, and about NIMBYism in response to windfarms?

© 2011 MHN Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Yardi  |   Point2  |   Multihousing News  |   Commercial Property Executive  |   RENTCafe  |   YES Energy Management  |   PropertyShark  |   RentGrow  |   Visual Homes  |   SiteStuff  |   Point2 Property Manager  |   ScreeningWorks  |   ResidentShield