At GreenBuildingsNY—held in conjunction with BuildingsNY at the Jacob Javits Convention Center June 16-17—yesterday, I attended U.S. Energy Group’ s presentation, “The Art of Managing Buildings for Energy Efficiency.” David Unger, chief operating officer, discussed how building owners and mangers can reduce fuel usage by 10 to 30 percent by implementing an energy management system.

As I’ve previously discussed, part of Mayor Bloomberg’s plaNYC initiative proposes a new energy code for existing buildings, as well as a mandate that would require these buildings to make energy improvements to pay for themselves within five years.

According to Unger, implementing an energy management system pays for itself in about two years—and depending on the price of fuel, the ROI could be even faster. While existing buildings undergoing energy retrofits will certainly need to look at replacing their windows, doors, insulation and appliances, among many other renovations, utilizing an energy management system to regulate your boiler system will most likely be the first—and perhaps easiest—step you take on your path to lowering your building’s energy consumption—and your bills. (Click here for additional tips on making your building more energy-efficient.)

Such systems make energy retrofits seem relatively easy—with U.S. Energy Group’s management system, for example, you can manage all your properties from one remote computer and receive updates via email and text message—and cost-effective.

But not all energy-efficient improvements need to be technologically based.

HUD, DOT (U.S. Department of Transportation) and the EPA (Environmental Protect Agency) have announced an interagency Partnership for Sustainable Communities to help improve affordable housing, transportation options—and lower transit costs—all while protecting the environment in communities nationwide. (Click here for MHN’s coverage of this announcement).

Such government initiatives, however seemingly basic and broad they may be, are greatly applauded by many industry organizations.

What do you think? Should we focus more on technologically advanced systems that are easy to use and upgrade—but direct their attention on more specific building systems—or should we embrace a more general approach that takes into account entire neighborhoods? Is there a happy medium that we can all use?

Caption for group photo: The Superintendent of Banks for the
State of New York, Richard Neiman, together with Jerome Belson,
President of the Associated Builders and Owners of Greater New York
(ABO), kicked off BuildingsNY 2009.

(Erika Schnitzer is associate editor at Multi-Housing News. She can be reached at  Erika.Schnitzer@nielsen.com)

 With gas prices steadily on the rise once again, developers and architects alike are looking more closely at alternatives to new construction in the suburbs. The antidote to sprawl, urban infill development has served as a catalyst for the urban revitalization process nationwide.

Part of this process involves a closer examination of transit-oriented development. While the easy solution would be to simply place housing near public transportation, many urban areas are lacking in resources and funds. Around the country, the industry is asking how the market will affect the creation of new transit options that are meant to enable further transit-oriented development.

Also garnering interest is the adaptive reuse of existing—sometimes even historic—buildings from commercial to residential. Such projects are just one more example of building greener; as Patrick Turner, the developer of Silo Point in Baltimore, notes, adaptive reuse projects are often greener than the greenest of new projects, as reusing an existing building is inherently environmentally friendly. But these projects tend to come with their own set of challenges, often forcing project teams to weigh the costs against the benefits.

Take, for example, Turner’s project—an old grain elevator that was converted into a mixed-use community with 228 luxury condos. The development team not only had to convince the city to rezone the site so it could be converted into a residential use, but they also had to deal with myriad physical constraints associated with the old industrial site. (Click here for MHN’s article)

With similar challenges a concern in other adaptive reuse developments, how will the credit crisis even further impact multi-housing and mixed-use projects on the boards?

At Multi-Housing World, join a panel of architects, including Rick Hammann, managing principal of WDG Architecture; Mark Humphreys, CEO of Humphreys & Partners Architects LP; and Randy Gerner, principal at GKV Architects PC, for a discussion of the future of urban infill.

In a session entitled, “Repurposing the Urban Landscape: Infill Case Studies,” the panel will discuss where the upcoming opportunities are, how you can tap into public/private partnerships, and what the hottest design trends are that can help urban infill projects blend into the existing urban fabric while also ensuring maximum lease-ups

And don’t forget—you can earn one AIA HSW/SD credit by attending this course.

See you in San Diego, September 29-October 1!

Click here to see the full Multi-Housing World 2009 Leadership Summit conference schedule. Registration is now open.

(Erika Schnitzer is Associate Editor at Multi-Housing News. She can be reached at Erika.Schnitzer@nielsen.com)

The USGBC recently released its “Top Ten Ways to Use Recovery Funds for Green Buildings.” In its introduction, the report notes that local governments have begun to think “holistically about how to use recovery dollars to advance sustainability in the built environment,” rather than basing change on a “project-by-project” basis.
 
This is pretty evident in the ever-increasing news about city and state efforts to mandate building standards and/or provide incentives to buildings that include a certain green checklist, if you will.

While most, if not all, of the USGBC’s Top Ten can be incorporated into multifamily, I find No. 2: Build or Expand Residential Energy Retrofit Programs, the most relevant in terms of government funding of multifamily projects. In my last note, I discussed NYC Mayor Bloomberg’s proposed energy retrofit legislation, but I failed to note any other local, state—or for that matter, federal—initiative involved in energy retrofits—particularly of multi-housing communities

Just in time to discuss this, I received news that HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan has announced that approximately $250 million in funding will be used to promote energy-efficient and green retrofits in multifamily housing. Accordingly, the plan is for 25,000 apartment units to become more energy-efficient as a result of the Secretary’s announced funding—which is being made available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. (Click here for a description of the Green Retrofit Program for Multifamily Housing.)

While these funds are only available for those owners already receiving project-based assistance through HUD, this certainly seems to be a step in the right direction—and a fairly large nod to multi-housing. (Does this mean the federal government is publicly acknowledging the importance of rental housing? I certainly hope so.)

But this acknowledgement only helps those already receiving public funding, namely affordable housing communities. In addition to the Green Retrofit Program, the Obama administration has provided a number of other funds for affordable housing. Scott Reithel, vice president of property management at Community Housing Partners, recently told MHN that he is “impressed with the appointment of Shaun Donovan, who has a lot of knowledge of the sector” and that the current administration is more focused on affordable housing.

Of course, these are the communities that need it the most, but state and local programs that encourage—or in some cases, mandate—energy retrofits will need funding, too.

What do you think? What, realistically, could the administration do to help in the greening effort of other multifamily communities?

(Share your thoughts. Email me at Erika.Schnitzer@nielsen.com)

As CAP rates rise, property managers and owners are looking to adjust to their current realities. The economic and financial crisis has forced owners to change course and look to plans B and C. In many cases, the proposed cash out year of 2009 has been pushed back to at least sometime in 2010 at the earliest, based on a new owner’s ability to obtain financing.

So what does plan B and C look like? For many, this concept was never thought of upon acquisition. But that is okay. It is never too late to change direction and tact for a while when you hit a stiff headwind.
Because holding on to properties for longer is now plan B, many have to readjust. "As Vacancies rise – and as some owners are also forced to hold on to buildings longer than intended – assisting clients' bottom lines has risen to the top of property managers' job descriptions. Thus, such firms have set out on the hunt for savings and revenue." Commercial Property News, Dec. '08, pg. 24

What does it look like to hunt for savings and revenue? Obvious answers are water-saving devices in tenant’s bathrooms and kitchens and CFL lighting in the common areas. But did you know that while these are good measures, there are better ones for this category? For example, using LED lighting in the common areas instead of CFLs. LEDs use, on average, 6 to 12 watts of energy compared to 23 to 35 watt CFLs. They cost more but payback is typically under two years and they last up to 10 times longer than a CFL. Wireless water control monitoring of tenant’s water usage makes sense in some markets where there are federal and state tax benefits. There are several utility companies who will pay for you to install regulators on your boilers.

The three endeavors above not only put money back in your pocket, but more importantly they raise the value of your property in this difficult financial time. Thus, you are better positioned for prosperity when it comes time to resell.

What do your current ads look like? Pick up any local apartment guide in your city and you will notice that the benefits in the ads almost always read something like this:
•    1, 2, and 3 bedrooms
•    Large floor plans
•    Pet friendly
•    Pool
•    Nearby shopping
Wouldn’t it be more interesting if your ads read something like this:
•    Cleanest property in fill in your town name here
•    Larger kitchens and living rooms for your comfort
•    Dog run for man’s best friend
•    Sparkling blue water in our pool
•    Walking distance to Wal-Mart

Since you are already paying for print advertising you may as well make it impactful. Not many do. I would write on the power of Google AdWords for your advertising but that is for another column.

Let me leave you with a ‘maintenance man’ tip of the week. Now that the warm weather months are upon us, more water is likely to be used via hose. Make sure all the bibs around your property are checked bi-weekly for drips that you are unnecessarily paying for. Tighten those bibs!

(Scott Yahraus is the president of Apartment Energy Consultants, a company that certifes multifamily properties as being “National Green Apartment Certified”. Click here to visit their Web site or www.GreenRetrofitter.com email Scott at Scott@GreenRetrofitter.com)
 

 

In announcing the proposed Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) budget this week, HUD Secretary Donovan seemed to affirm a shift in direction from the Bush years—towards a renewed emphasis on rental housing.

Speaking in a teleconference to reporters, he said that the focus has been missing for “too long” from rental housing. He commented that we have had “accelerated disinvestment in key housing and community efforts” in the country in the past few years.

And that we have had “a housing policy focused almost exclusively on homeownership at the expense and/or neglect of rental housing as a part of the national housing policy.”

Rental housing is now HUD’s “mission” once again after years of neglect, says Secretary Donovan. Reassuringly, he says we must ensure that the “focus on rental housing is protected.”

Secretary Donovan seems to understand that rental housing may be more critical than ever given today’s economic environment. At the least, it is often the first line of defense for families that are not financially well-off.

Here are some of the measures contained in the HUD budget proposal that may back up Secretary Donovan’s assertion about HUD’s renewed commitment to rental housing. The following proposals for increased funding are all aimed at rental housing programs. [See the MHN report.]

-A $1.8 billion increase in effective funding for the Section 8 voucher program, which, Secretary Donovan says, is the most effective and quickest tool to help the lowest income families.

-A $1 billion contribution towards the National Housing Trust Fund, which was created to build, rehabilitate and preserve 1.5 million unit of rental housing for the lowest income families.

-Fully funding the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program through a $550 million increase in funding.

-A new $250 million Choice Neighborhoods Initiatives for distressed public and assisted housing that will replace HOPE VI.

By the way, HUD also proposed to eliminate the Bush Administration’s flagship American Dream Downpayment initiative, which aimed to assist first-time homeowners with down payment and closing costs. The program, however, may be wrapped into the HOME program.

(Keat Foong is the executive editor at Multi-Housing News. She can be contacted at Keat.Foong@nielsen.com)

The nation’s economic data has turned from a seemingly endless parade of bad news, to more of a mixed bag as of late, with some positive (or relatively positive) readings sprinkled in among the doom-and-gloom. The dichotomy is of course providing optimists and pessimists alike with plenty of grist for their respective mills. We’ll try to keep a clear-eyed view of things.

April saw retail sales continue their slump as consumers kept their purse strings tight on non-essential purchases. According to a Commerce Department report, retail sales sagged 0.4 percent during the month; but for those apt to look on the bright side, the rate of decline was considerably slower than March, during which sales sunk 1.3 percent. Still though, most economists deemed the report cause for concern–no strange words over the past year or so.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner plans to head to China later this month, for discussions on strengthening relations between the two nations. The Secretary will depart on May 30th for Beijing, in the Obama administration’s most direct overture yet to that nation. Considering China’s status as both one of our largest trading partners as well as one of the biggest holders of American debt, here’s hoping Geithner makes a good impression.

The job market got some bad news and some good news last week. The bad news was that unemployment hit a 25-year high in April, but the—relatively—good news was that monthly job losses fell to their lowest level in six months. The Labor Department said Friday that employers cut 539,000 jobs during April, down from nearly 700,000 in March and the best figure since last October. But the Labor Department also said unemployment rose to 8.9 percent in April, up from 8.5 percent in March and the highest level since September 1983.  Since the beginning of 2008, the economy has shed 5.7 million, and some economists are projecting job losses to continue into 2010.

And speaking of record highs, the single-family home market continues to take major lumps, as the rate of foreclosures spiked to a new peak in April. One in every 374 homes in America was foreclosed upon last month, according to industry monitor RealtyTrac. This far this year, foreclosures are up 32 percent from this time in 2008. RealtyTrac predicts another three to six months until the market picks up again. It’s a pretty good indicator of how bad things have gotten that that prediction seems like cause for celebration.

Meanwhile, consumer borrowing plunged in March, falling a record $11.1 billion according to the Federal Reserve. Borrowing dropped 5.2 percent from February to a total of $2.55 trillion—it was the biggest percentage drop since December 1990. Non-revolving credit, which is typically taken out for big ticket items including cars and college educations, fell 4.2 percent, while revolving borrowing on credit cards dropped 6.8 percent.

Despite the slow state of consumer borrowing, there are plenty of other indicators out there that the economy might be putting the worst behind it. And these reports are pushing oil prices higher. Light sweet crude has ticked up of late toward $60 a barrel, prices not seen since last November. Since closing at $33.98 a barrel on February 12, oil is up nearly 75 percent, but remains well off the sky-high price it reached last summer. 

Finally, the financial meltdown claimed its latest victim last week when Westsound Bank in Bremerton, Washington, was closed by regulators, marking the 33rd bank to fail this year. The closing will cost the FDIC some $108 million in deposit insurance. Another Washington State institution, Kitsap Bank, will assume Westsound’s deposits and take over the nine branches of the failed bank.

(Adam Perrotta is a news writer with Commercial Property News, MHN's sister publication. He can be reached a t
Adam.Perrotta@nielsen.com )

What’s everywhere, practically invisible and costs $15 billion each year?
 
Energy in New York City buildings!

New York City Mayor Mike Bloomberg, along with Council Speaker Christine Quinn, recently announced plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from existing residential, commercial and government buildings.

As MHN has reported, the proposed legislation is aimed at encouraging developers to meet tougher energy requirements any time they renovate, to conduct an energy audit every 10 years, and to make energy improvements that will pay for themselves within five years. (Click here to read MHN’s story.) According to the city, the energy improvements could save property owners $750 million a year—assuming they upgrade everything from their lighting systems to boilers. (Click here to read the proposal.)

This is the first measure of its kind in the United States—but hopefully not the last.

I recently spoke with Nancy Biberman, president of WHEDCo (Women’s Housing and Economic Development Corporation) about Mayor Bloomberg’s plan. Biberman certainly knows her stuff about energy retrofits—for the past three years, the organization has been working on the retrofit of Urban Horizons, a 10-story, 132-unit community that also includes 40,000 sq. ft. of program space, a 4,000-sq.-ft. commercial kitchen, health care facility, classrooms and administrative offices. (Click here for more information about WHEDCo’s Energy Retrofit Initiatives.)

Though certainly happy about the changes Bloomberg is proposing, Biberman is concerned about enforcement. She tells me that, from the bills she’s seen, “there are no clear consequences” for building owners who don’t take Bloomberg’s proposed steps.

This got me thinking—what kind of incentives and/or penalties would be most effective for owners facing what they see as potential loss in revenue (even if it is, in fact, a short-term loss and they could actually recoup the costs in as little as five years)?

Did you know that under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, developers can deduct up to $1.80 per sq. ft. for buildings that achieve at least a 50 percent energy savings target (through energy and power cost reductions for the building’s heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water and interior lighting systems)? This deduction is now available through the end of 2013. (Click here for a break down in tax credits.)

FYI, the New York Chapter of the USGBC will be hosting a symposium tomorrow, May 7, with Rohit Aggarwala, director of the Mayor’s Office of Long Term Planning and Sustainability, to discuss the plan’s details. (Click here for details.)

What do you think? What incentives and/or penalties do you think should be incorporated into Mayor Bloomberg’s plan to make it most effective?

(You can contact Erika Schnitzer at Erika.Schnitzer@nielsen.com)

Earth Day is now Earth Week.

News about climate change and the green movement—and what everyone is doing to advocate against one and promote the other—is everywhere this week.

Last weekend, for example, The Tower Cos. held a “Recycling Day Festival@The Blairs,”—a 1,400-unit community in Silver Spring, Md.—collecting donations of clothing, electronics and furniture with participating sponsors. And Archstone is hosting a “Green Leasing Expo,” a four-day event in the West Region designed to encourage residents and prospects to conserve natural resources—and at the same time is offering a “Go Green and Get Green” savings of up to $500 in rent with the signing of a new lease.

On a larger scale, the Environmental Protection Agency took its first step toward regulating pollution last week when it declared CO2 and other heat-trapping gases as pollutants that threaten the public heath and welfare of individuals.

To some of you in the industry, all of this may not seem so—excuse the pun—earth-shattering. I keep talking to industry experts who insist green building is no longer just a trend or a movement; it is here to stay. (And with the recently approved National Green Building Standard, green building has become even more expected, to some extent.)

So what is the new norm? As an industry, have our expectations surpassed those of the average consumer?

The National Association of Home Builders recently announced that over 2,700 industry professionals have achieved its Certified Green Professional designation. And the Green Building Certification Institute  (GBCI), the organization that administers LEED AP certification, just last week announced that over 101,000 professionals have earned their LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) AP credential.

As we keep one eye on the environment and the other on the economy, this number is only expected to rise. According to GBCI, the number of LEED APs doubled in the last year, outpacing the organization’s projections, as the economy took a turn for the worse and industry professionals recognized the competitive edge this certification would provide for them.

Perhaps, then, the government should look to the built environment for examples of best practices for cutting energy costs. As an industry, we have seen some truly innovative—as well as seemingly ordinary—measures to reduce greenhouse gases and improve residents’ quality of life—not to mention that many, if not all, of these initiatives end up positively affecting the bottom line in the long run.

A New York Times magazine article this weekend discusses how some evidence seems to suggest that, at least for now, homeowners are making more environmentally sound decisions. Though the author notes this may be a sign of the economic times, certainly we are all becoming more aware of the health and financial benefits of greening our homes.

And its not just homeowners. According to a recent Apartments.com study, renters are becoming more conscious of the environmentally friendly measures they can take in their apartments. The survey found that 65 percent of renters emphasize the need for an environmentally friendly lifestyle and that 60 percent of renters claim to search for apartments based on their sustainable offerings (Click here to read MHN’s coverage of the study).

It’s not as if we are just now waking up and realizing that we all must take part in reducing greenhouse gas emissions to help the environment and preserve whatever future our children may have. Our industry, which is certainly one that has a tremendous impact on carbon emissions—buildings are responsible for 70 percent of electricity use and 40 percent of carbon emissions, after all—has quite clearly taken a stance on the importance of sustainability.

Share your thoughts, as well as what you doing to celebrate Earth Day, or rather, Week. Email me at Erika.Schnitzer@nielsen.com.

(Erika Schnitzer is the associate editor at Multi-Housing News)

You don’t need to own or manage multi-housing units to see how effectively today’s high-efficiency conservation fixtures work. Even in a single-family unit, the results of retrofitting with high-efficiency products can be impressive. But when you begin to do math for the multiple units, the results can be downright awe-inspiring. If you are prone to green thinking at all, you can’t help but wonder what it would be like if everyone everywhere decided to conserve water.

The beauty of water conservation is that it is really, really easy. And it can be very inexpensive, too.

High efficiency toilets (HETs), of course, make an enormous difference in the conservation effort. But toilets are a bigger-ticket item, and installing/retrofitting with the latest water-efficient models generally only appeals to owners/managers who are either doing new construction or whose existing fixtures are old and need replacing anyway.

Owners/managers who fall into those two categories are usually candidates for “flapperless” toilet models. The appeal there is that the flapperless guarantees 1.28 GPF (gallon per flush) (because it is not the tank that fills with water, but a tip bucket within the tank, and it only holds 1.28 gallons). The flapperless is virtually maintenance-free, because there is no pesky flapper constantly calling for replacement—and then often leaking anyway if the replacement parts are even slightly off-kilter.

But toilets aside, the easy-to-install, incredible-result-getting conservation fixtures I’m talking about are so small they can fit in the palm of your hand, and are so inexpensive that one retrofit or installation can cost less than a gallon of paint. I’m talking showerheads and aerators.

Replacing an old water-hog of a showerhead with one of the many high-efficiency models that are currently being manufactured is so easy a kid on a step-stool can manage it in just a couple of minutes—and without any tools. But even more exciting is the fact that the high-efficiency models being made these days don’t feel “low-flow” at all.

A special technology uses a flow compensator (instead of a flow resister) to allow less water to stream out but at a higher pressure, so it feels just as luxurious as showerheads that use more water. And the models being made today are just as adjustable as the water-hog models of yesteryear, offering everything from a gentle needle spray to a forceful jet. Today’s high-efficiency models generally offer between 40 and 50 percent reduction of water over standard models. And they are nothing compared to some of the models in development.

Think of it: The average person spends about seven minutes in the shower daily. If we’re talking an average of 1.8 people per household unit showering for seven minutes a day, that’s almost 13 minutes of nonstop water usage, not to mention the electric or gas energy that is heating it. Once you start multiplying 40 to 50 percent savings by multi-unit housing numbers, you can get into some pretty big numbers.

Aerators are in some ways even more of a conservation tool than showerheads. They are outfitted with the same flow compensator technologies, but while their water- and energy-saving percentages are slightly less impressive (they generally offer about a 30 percent water/energy reduction) when looked at on a case-by-case basis, some new kitchen aerators feature a pause lever that reduces water to a trickle while keeping it at the same temperature.

Anyone who spends a lot of time in the kitchen doing dishes can tell you that this fantastic feature can’t be underestimated. It means that you can wash a plate, flip up the pause lever while you place the plate on the drain board and reach for the next plate, and then flip the pause lever back down when you are ready to wash plate number two. People don’t realize how much time (and thus wasted water) passes between plates until they begin to use this feature.

Even owners/managers who are not in a position (because they don’t pay the utility bills) to gain directly from such savings can still experience a gain. By installing conservation products in their units, they can pass savings onto their renters and/or customers. The current standards for showerheads are 2.5 GPM at 80 psi; for aerators it is 2.2 GPM; and toilets are currently at 1.6 GPF. These guidelines were established in the EPA legislation of 1992.

Once you start cutting away at these water levels, and multiplying the savings by units, you are talking enormous savings for the earth too.

Almost everyone wants to go green these days, but many people have no idea where to begin. In this way, owner/managers can actually become leaders in the green revolution.

(Matt Voohees is the business development representative for Niagara Conservation)

As concerned taxpayers around the nation take to the streets in “tea parties” to protest the federal government’s spending on financial rescue efforts, an eventual economic recovery still seems far away. But there are a few glimmers of hope on the horizon.

Those aggrieved tea partiers can at least take some solace in the fact that the money they do have left after doling out to Uncle Sam will go a bit further these days. The Consumer Price Index fell in March by 0.1 percent and—more notably—registered its first annual decline since 1955, dropping 0.4 percent from March of 2008.

Of course, that is not exactly cause for dancing in the streets, as most of the decline was due to the rapid fall of gas prices from their record highs of last summer. As the weather warms again, prices at the pump should begin to inch back up again, though probably not to the astronomical, speculation-driven levels of summer ’08. Still though, as consumers continue to feel the pinch in their pocketbooks, rising gas prices could further curb spending in other areas.

On the other hand, though, comes news that world demand for oil is continuing to shrink–and rapidly so. OPEC’s latest monthly oil market report predicted that demand would sink by 1.37 million barrels per day in 2009, to an average of 84.2 million barrels per day. A big chunk of the slowdown is being pegged to developing countries such as China and India, whose formerly-booming appetite for oil has been curbed by the global economic slowdown.

The demand drop should put downward pressure on prices, but OPEC said it will slash production by 4.2 million barrels per day in order to bolster price levels. What the net outcome will be to the American consumer—and by extension, the American economy—remains to be seen.

One illustration of how the spending of John Q. Public ripples throughout the economy; as consumers pull back at the cash register, U.S. states are seeing sales tax coffers dry up. State revenue fell 4 percent in last year’s fourth quarter, the biggest such drop in 50 years, according to a report by the Rockefeller Institute of Government. Thirty-five states saw total tax revenue drop during the quarter, with six-seeing double-digit declines.

And the situation is not likely to improve any time soon. So far this year, initial data indicates that 41 states have reported tax collections in January and February were down 12.8 percent compared to the first two months of 2008.

As the economy continues to weaken, state and local governments are likely to continue to see tax revenue shrink, limiting options for fiscal stimulus at those levels. Whether you agree with this week’s tea partiers or not, one thing seems certain; any further government effort to kick start the economy will probably have to come from Washington.  

(Adam Perrotta is a news writer at Commercial Property News, MHN's sister publication . He can be contacted at Adam.Perrotta@nielsen.com)

© 2012 MHN Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha