Here in California, there’s a buzz brewing in the construction industry that’s going to have quite a future.  As you may know, our state has imposed upon itself a noble goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions drastically over the next forty years or so.  You may also be aware that buildings—their construction and operation–typically account for about forty percent of the GHG produced in the United States.  Therefore, those of us who plan and design new buildings and communities are intently interested in figuring out how it will ever be possible to meet the stated goal.  The quick answer, of course, is that it won’t be if we continue with business as usual.  We’re going to have to look beyond the systems and solutions to which we have grown accustomed, and really try out some new and inventive stuff.

The idea about which I am currently the most excited is not, in fact, particularly new, but it’s been receiving a lot of attention lately, and consequently, something of a makeover.  That idea is co-generation, or combined heating and power (CHP), as it is sometimes known.  Take it one step further and you have CCHP, or combined cooling, heating, and power.  Sometimes this is also called “tri-generation.”  At the heart of this system is a central plant that burns fuel to heat water to turn a turbine to produce electricity.  (The exhaust is “scrubbed” before being released into the atmosphere.)  The excess heat is collected and used to warm domestic water or air.  Add absorption chillers to this starter kit, and cooling is provided as well.  (Though I must confess right here that it still baffles me how engineers are able to produce chilly air from hot water, but I’m working on it.)

Many college campuses and other institutions already have such systems.  They are, in effect, their own small utilities.  Because many different buildings are able to function off the central system, there are economies of scale.  To make smaller, individual projects or communities work with a CCHP system will require sharing of resources in a way that we have not been accustomed to in private development. 

On the other hand, we have already done infill projects, which, for various reasons, used a centralized boiler for domestic hot water, so the idea is not beyond imagining.  These boilers have typically been powered by natural gas, which is a relatively efficient process, but it still relies on a non-renewable resource as a fuel source.  Some of the bigger, industrial facilities, or even our emergency generators, run on diesel.  In the new generation of CCHP, other, more sustainable energy sources are being employed, such as bio-diesel made from used cooking oil, or bio-mass, which is typically produced from industrial or agricultural waste products (think sawdust or perhaps cornstalks.)

Perhaps the most exciting idea I’ve seen recently is solar tri-generation. This works similarly to the other fuel-powered systems, except it relies entirely on a renewable resource—the sun—to make electricity and heat water.  (Actually, this is more of a solar “team” generation as I understand it. The hot water for heating and cooling is heated up in little tubes run on the roof; the photovoltaics produce electricity that powers the lights and plugs, but also the condensors and fans required to make the chilled air.  But who am I to quibble?)

This is what the future looks like—even modest-sized projects will include their own generation facilities in order to dramatically reduce their energy consumption from the grid, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions at the generation source.  While the environment will benefit, these systems, while expensive at the outset, will absolutely save owners money over the lifespan of a project.

And who isn’t interested in that?

(Daniel Gehman is principal at Thomas Cox Architects. He can be reached at DanielG@tca-arch.com)

“In Russia, we only have two television channels. Channel One is propaganda. Channel Two consists of a KBG officer telling you: Turn back at once to Channel One.”
Russian Comedian Yakov Smirnoff

Hello Comrades. the next message you see may be from the Commissar’s office thanking you for contributing your information freely to the Motherland. Russian company Digital Sky Technologies just bought into Facebook and while there aren’t a lot of bells going off at the Federal Trade Commission, you can be sure the National Security Agency is working late nights trying to combat this one. If you happen to be reading this, and have either a security clearance or a sensitive position, cancel your Facebook page now.

Russia is still, despite heavily promoted public relations, a wilderness of corruption, with no avowed purpose as a U.S. ally. In fact, we are still, after 50 years facing off with Russia in many nations where they’ve provided military observers, trainers and weapons systems that would shock you. Witness the recent ascension of Putin to Prime Minister by the Puppet President Medvedev. If anyone doubts that Putin is still yanking Eastern Europe’s chain, remember that when they cut off the natural gas supply to the Ukraine, the UK took a few days to get an alternative supply.

What does this mean for the average Facebook user?

We live in an international economy and the patterns of employment, spending and consumer demand are more complex than ever. We’re dependent, in fact, as an apartment industry on many of these. Take for example, the H1-b program. These visas allow knowledge workers to live and work in the U.S. for a period of time. Many multifamily companies and their contractors hire these recent arrivals. In turn, most of them live in apartments and their tenure, based on renewals in their status makes them good longer term renters. Since a lot of H1-b residents work in defense-related industries, it would not be surprising to discover that if they have an active Facebook account, they’re probably not going to be renewed. That makes an already shifting demand problem even worse for apartment owners.

There are those who prefer to think of Russia as a fuzzy little bear somewhere between Finland, Siberia and Mongolia, but in the present political environment, there is little democracy in Russia. Imagine the outcry if Syria bought part of Facebook and you were dealing with an ayatollah instead of a faux czar? Would that be any more comfortable?

We didn’t want to see our ports sold to Dubai, we’re not happy about Chrysler becoming part of Fiat and now Facebook is up for sale, bit by bit, to the latest despot. It’s time our national borders extended to electronic records and files and steps were taken to protect public information from being for nefarious purposes. Take down your Facebook page and remove any personally identifiable information, and please tell everyone you know that a Facebook fact can rapidly become One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich.

(Comrade Jack is the Managing Proletariat of Kern Investment Research, a real estate research consultancy and can be reached at 301-601-1900.)

The USGBC recently released its “Top Ten Ways to Use Recovery Funds for Green Buildings.” In its introduction, the report notes that local governments have begun to think “holistically about how to use recovery dollars to advance sustainability in the built environment,” rather than basing change on a “project-by-project” basis.
 
This is pretty evident in the ever-increasing news about city and state efforts to mandate building standards and/or provide incentives to buildings that include a certain green checklist, if you will.

While most, if not all, of the USGBC’s Top Ten can be incorporated into multifamily, I find No. 2: Build or Expand Residential Energy Retrofit Programs, the most relevant in terms of government funding of multifamily projects. In my last note, I discussed NYC Mayor Bloomberg’s proposed energy retrofit legislation, but I failed to note any other local, state—or for that matter, federal—initiative involved in energy retrofits—particularly of multi-housing communities

Just in time to discuss this, I received news that HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan has announced that approximately $250 million in funding will be used to promote energy-efficient and green retrofits in multifamily housing. Accordingly, the plan is for 25,000 apartment units to become more energy-efficient as a result of the Secretary’s announced funding—which is being made available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. (Click here for a description of the Green Retrofit Program for Multifamily Housing.)

While these funds are only available for those owners already receiving project-based assistance through HUD, this certainly seems to be a step in the right direction—and a fairly large nod to multi-housing. (Does this mean the federal government is publicly acknowledging the importance of rental housing? I certainly hope so.)

But this acknowledgement only helps those already receiving public funding, namely affordable housing communities. In addition to the Green Retrofit Program, the Obama administration has provided a number of other funds for affordable housing. Scott Reithel, vice president of property management at Community Housing Partners, recently told MHN that he is “impressed with the appointment of Shaun Donovan, who has a lot of knowledge of the sector” and that the current administration is more focused on affordable housing.

Of course, these are the communities that need it the most, but state and local programs that encourage—or in some cases, mandate—energy retrofits will need funding, too.

What do you think? What, realistically, could the administration do to help in the greening effort of other multifamily communities?

(Share your thoughts. Email me at Erika.Schnitzer@nielsen.com)

Construction financing is still attainable, if you know where to look. Learn about obtaining and nenegotia ting for debt financing—including construction, acquisition and refinancing—in today’s difficult environment at the upcoming Multi-Housing World Leadership Summit 2009

The conference, which is produced in conjunction with Multi-Housing News  magazine by Nielsen Business Media as part of the Nielsen Co., will be held from Sept. 29-Oct. 1 in San Diego.

One panel in the Finance and Investment Track is called “Show Me the Money: How to Find, Negotiate and Secure Construction, Acquisition, Rehab and Permanent Financing.”

The panel will be led by David Hendrickson, managing director of Real Estate Investment Banking at Jones Lang LaSalle, a global financial and professional services firm specializing in real estate. In the multifamily arena, the company has been active providing both investment sales brokerage and multifamily financing advisory services.

In particular, the panel will provide guidance on identifying the active debt financing sources today; the pros and cons of the different sources of financing; and how to approach capital sources, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FHA-insured financiers, for the best deals.

Also, have your questions answered. Panelists will include an executive from Freddie Mac, Mitchell Kiffe, vice president of production and sales, Multifamily Division at Freddie Mac. Also on the panel are Andrew MacIver, senior vice president at JP Morgan Chase and Jack Bauer, vice president at Prudential.

Other sessions in Multi-Housing World Leadership Summit’s Finance/Investment Track, which is also chaired by Jones Lang LaSalle’s Hendrickson, includes: “When Will It Be Time to Buy Multifamily—and Is it Too Late to Sell?”; “Taking the ‘Stress’ Out of Distressed—Distressed Multifamily 101 for Buyers and Sellers”; and “Thriving Despite the Capital Shortages: Forecast and Advice for Multifamily Debt and Equity Financing.”

Multi-Housing World Leadership Summit also includes general sessions about the economy and multifamily markets, and other educational tracks specializing in the multifamily sector, on Operations, Architecture and Design, Technology and Marketing.

Hope to see you in San Diego in September.

(Keat Foong is the executive editor at Multi-Housing News. She can reached at Keat.Foong@nielsen.com)

As CAP rates rise, property managers and owners are looking to adjust to their current realities. The economic and financial crisis has forced owners to change course and look to plans B and C. In many cases, the proposed cash out year of 2009 has been pushed back to at least sometime in 2010 at the earliest, based on a new owner’s ability to obtain financing.

So what does plan B and C look like? For many, this concept was never thought of upon acquisition. But that is okay. It is never too late to change direction and tact for a while when you hit a stiff headwind.
Because holding on to properties for longer is now plan B, many have to readjust. "As Vacancies rise – and as some owners are also forced to hold on to buildings longer than intended – assisting clients' bottom lines has risen to the top of property managers' job descriptions. Thus, such firms have set out on the hunt for savings and revenue." Commercial Property News, Dec. '08, pg. 24

What does it look like to hunt for savings and revenue? Obvious answers are water-saving devices in tenant’s bathrooms and kitchens and CFL lighting in the common areas. But did you know that while these are good measures, there are better ones for this category? For example, using LED lighting in the common areas instead of CFLs. LEDs use, on average, 6 to 12 watts of energy compared to 23 to 35 watt CFLs. They cost more but payback is typically under two years and they last up to 10 times longer than a CFL. Wireless water control monitoring of tenant’s water usage makes sense in some markets where there are federal and state tax benefits. There are several utility companies who will pay for you to install regulators on your boilers.

The three endeavors above not only put money back in your pocket, but more importantly they raise the value of your property in this difficult financial time. Thus, you are better positioned for prosperity when it comes time to resell.

What do your current ads look like? Pick up any local apartment guide in your city and you will notice that the benefits in the ads almost always read something like this:
•    1, 2, and 3 bedrooms
•    Large floor plans
•    Pet friendly
•    Pool
•    Nearby shopping
Wouldn’t it be more interesting if your ads read something like this:
•    Cleanest property in fill in your town name here
•    Larger kitchens and living rooms for your comfort
•    Dog run for man’s best friend
•    Sparkling blue water in our pool
•    Walking distance to Wal-Mart

Since you are already paying for print advertising you may as well make it impactful. Not many do. I would write on the power of Google AdWords for your advertising but that is for another column.

Let me leave you with a ‘maintenance man’ tip of the week. Now that the warm weather months are upon us, more water is likely to be used via hose. Make sure all the bibs around your property are checked bi-weekly for drips that you are unnecessarily paying for. Tighten those bibs!

(Scott Yahraus is the president of Apartment Energy Consultants, a company that certifes multifamily properties as being “National Green Apartment Certified”. Click here to visit their Web site or www.GreenRetrofitter.com email Scott at Scott@GreenRetrofitter.com)
 

 

Spotlight on Operations Track
 
A recent assessment by the Wharton School shows a dramatic surge in economic losses from natural catastrophes worldwide, up from just over $50 billion in the 1950s to almost $800 billion in the 1990s.

William Gray, a forecaster and the head of the Tropical Meteorology Project at Colorado State University, warns that the probability of a major hurricane striking the U.S. Coast is estimated at 74 percent, compared with the average of 52 percent over the past century.

Recently MHN talked to Michael Payton, senior vice president of CAS Partners Insurance Services, the parent company of apartment manager Riverstone Residential, and others about how to handle the unprecedented risks faced by apartment companies today. Click here to read “Weathering the Risks.”

Severe weather conditions brought on by climate change are cause for concern. But just as worrying to property managers and property owners are the effects of the economic crisis on the resident population.

What impact has the changing economy had on bad debt and overall credit risk? Don’t find out the hard way. Join us in San Diego on Thursday, October 1 for “Screening: Best Practices Ensure Maximum Occupancy and Minimal Bad Debt.”

Click here to see the full Multi-Housing World 2009 Leadership Summit conference schedule. Registration is now open.

A panel of multifamily experts, including Mark Van Tilburg, director of operations, Archon Residential, will discuss the most effective screening strategies—and how they can be optimized to ensure maximum occupancy and minimal bad debt. This session will also explore how credit score trends, rental payment history and criminal database changes impact rental decisions.

Van Tilburg oversees all aspects of corporate operations at Archon Residential, including acquisition due diligence, ancillary revenues, utility programs, energy management, project management, systems implementation, national purchasing and OneSite systems.

David Carner, president LeasingDesk, RealPage Inc. will moderate the panel.

See you in San Diego between September 29-October 1.

Please click here for a video interview with Jay Harris of First Advantage SafeRent about the results of the first quarter 2009 Multifamily Applicant Risk Index.

(Diana Mosher can be contacted at Diana.Mosher@nielsen.com)

In announcing the proposed Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) budget this week, HUD Secretary Donovan seemed to affirm a shift in direction from the Bush years—towards a renewed emphasis on rental housing.

Speaking in a teleconference to reporters, he said that the focus has been missing for “too long” from rental housing. He commented that we have had “accelerated disinvestment in key housing and community efforts” in the country in the past few years.

And that we have had “a housing policy focused almost exclusively on homeownership at the expense and/or neglect of rental housing as a part of the national housing policy.”

Rental housing is now HUD’s “mission” once again after years of neglect, says Secretary Donovan. Reassuringly, he says we must ensure that the “focus on rental housing is protected.”

Secretary Donovan seems to understand that rental housing may be more critical than ever given today’s economic environment. At the least, it is often the first line of defense for families that are not financially well-off.

Here are some of the measures contained in the HUD budget proposal that may back up Secretary Donovan’s assertion about HUD’s renewed commitment to rental housing. The following proposals for increased funding are all aimed at rental housing programs. [See the MHN report.]

-A $1.8 billion increase in effective funding for the Section 8 voucher program, which, Secretary Donovan says, is the most effective and quickest tool to help the lowest income families.

-A $1 billion contribution towards the National Housing Trust Fund, which was created to build, rehabilitate and preserve 1.5 million unit of rental housing for the lowest income families.

-Fully funding the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program through a $550 million increase in funding.

-A new $250 million Choice Neighborhoods Initiatives for distressed public and assisted housing that will replace HOPE VI.

By the way, HUD also proposed to eliminate the Bush Administration’s flagship American Dream Downpayment initiative, which aimed to assist first-time homeowners with down payment and closing costs. The program, however, may be wrapped into the HOME program.

(Keat Foong is the executive editor at Multi-Housing News. She can be contacted at Keat.Foong@nielsen.com)

The state of mind to which I am referring when I mention “conviction” in this blog space is that “of being convinced,” according to my World Book dictionary. To take a position on something that may seem edgy, counter-cultural, annoying, or whatever the counter-intuitive flavor of the week happens to be, requires more than a casual commitment. To stand in the face of opposition, baby, you gotta’ believe!
 
Last week I regaled you with my story of finding a way to take the office kitchen wastes home on the train. Hopefully that struck as many of you as being “inspirationally renegade” as it did being “unimaginably loopy.” Well, it’s where I’m at; and it’s because of conviction—I am absolutely persuaded that what I’m doing is the right thing to do, even if it seems odd to many people.

For the same reason that compels me to take the refuse home on public transit, I also continually seek to learn about the latest developments in design, systems and practices that can help the multifamily and mixed-use projects I work on to do more with less—and on a real practical level, where it is easy to see the benefits.

“Sustainability” is not quite a religion, though it is often presented almost as such. The early adapters have infiltrated the halls of government, and the result is an impending juggernaut of legislation that will convert the unbelieving by the sword, as it were.

This leaves true believers to shoulder the burden of persuading, convincing, enticing and cajoling the greater market that resource-sensitive planning and execution of projects is a really good idea—both in the short run AND the long run. We must use every tool at our disposal to do this, of course, but the most obvious one is the economic argument.

I’ll use my own home as an illustration. Among the services I purchase on a “pay-for-what-you-use” basis are electricity (more on that later), gas and water. My trash pick-up is a flat fee. I will best serve my own cash flow and bottom line if I reduce my consumption of those items. This is pretty “no-brainer” territory. Once I’m motivated, I will be sure all my appliances are the highest efficiency possible, my light bulbs are CFLs or on dimmers, I keep my house at more modest temperature settings—you know the drill.

But I chose to go a bit beyond that. Just over two years ago, I installed a photo-voltaic array on my house that was designed to provide up to 90% of my annual average electricity use. The metrics show it has replaced 85%, which is pretty darn close. When I committed, the pay-back period was about 15 years . . . without factoring in increasing electricity costs. As it turns out, I am averting the contribution of about a half-ton a month of carbon emissions into the atmosphere. (And yes, I’m still looking for someone to purchase this from me as an offset!)

Now, with California in a drought, I’m looking more closely at my water use, and I’m proud to say I just schlepped home my first ultra-low flush replacement toilet for my house. Granted, I needed to replace a 40-year old fixture, but still—my heart was in the right place. It will be interesting to measure, after its installation, how much of an impact it has on my water bill.
OK, enough with the pedagogical basics. The simple truth is that there are reasonable measures that can be taken so that dwellings consume less of the things that are in limited supply, and are, hence, expensive. We want to find every way to take advantage of savings in these categories, for the good old reliable reason that it will save our owners money and help their bottom line.

That it might be actually helping the planet? Secondary. But let’s take one thing at a time. Building performance is not a zero sum game. It is possible to be zealous and patient in the same instance. They have a word for this: “conviction.”

(Daniel Gehman is principal at Thomas Cox Architects. He can be reached at DanielG@tca-arch.com)

The nation’s economic data has turned from a seemingly endless parade of bad news, to more of a mixed bag as of late, with some positive (or relatively positive) readings sprinkled in among the doom-and-gloom. The dichotomy is of course providing optimists and pessimists alike with plenty of grist for their respective mills. We’ll try to keep a clear-eyed view of things.

April saw retail sales continue their slump as consumers kept their purse strings tight on non-essential purchases. According to a Commerce Department report, retail sales sagged 0.4 percent during the month; but for those apt to look on the bright side, the rate of decline was considerably slower than March, during which sales sunk 1.3 percent. Still though, most economists deemed the report cause for concern–no strange words over the past year or so.

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner plans to head to China later this month, for discussions on strengthening relations between the two nations. The Secretary will depart on May 30th for Beijing, in the Obama administration’s most direct overture yet to that nation. Considering China’s status as both one of our largest trading partners as well as one of the biggest holders of American debt, here’s hoping Geithner makes a good impression.

The job market got some bad news and some good news last week. The bad news was that unemployment hit a 25-year high in April, but the—relatively—good news was that monthly job losses fell to their lowest level in six months. The Labor Department said Friday that employers cut 539,000 jobs during April, down from nearly 700,000 in March and the best figure since last October. But the Labor Department also said unemployment rose to 8.9 percent in April, up from 8.5 percent in March and the highest level since September 1983.  Since the beginning of 2008, the economy has shed 5.7 million, and some economists are projecting job losses to continue into 2010.

And speaking of record highs, the single-family home market continues to take major lumps, as the rate of foreclosures spiked to a new peak in April. One in every 374 homes in America was foreclosed upon last month, according to industry monitor RealtyTrac. This far this year, foreclosures are up 32 percent from this time in 2008. RealtyTrac predicts another three to six months until the market picks up again. It’s a pretty good indicator of how bad things have gotten that that prediction seems like cause for celebration.

Meanwhile, consumer borrowing plunged in March, falling a record $11.1 billion according to the Federal Reserve. Borrowing dropped 5.2 percent from February to a total of $2.55 trillion—it was the biggest percentage drop since December 1990. Non-revolving credit, which is typically taken out for big ticket items including cars and college educations, fell 4.2 percent, while revolving borrowing on credit cards dropped 6.8 percent.

Despite the slow state of consumer borrowing, there are plenty of other indicators out there that the economy might be putting the worst behind it. And these reports are pushing oil prices higher. Light sweet crude has ticked up of late toward $60 a barrel, prices not seen since last November. Since closing at $33.98 a barrel on February 12, oil is up nearly 75 percent, but remains well off the sky-high price it reached last summer. 

Finally, the financial meltdown claimed its latest victim last week when Westsound Bank in Bremerton, Washington, was closed by regulators, marking the 33rd bank to fail this year. The closing will cost the FDIC some $108 million in deposit insurance. Another Washington State institution, Kitsap Bank, will assume Westsound’s deposits and take over the nine branches of the failed bank.

(Adam Perrotta is a news writer with Commercial Property News, MHN's sister publication. He can be reached a t
Adam.Perrotta@nielsen.com )

No, I’m not talking about the criminal kind, though some might consider the following story to be crazy. I’ve wanted to talk about this for a while. The tipping point probably occurred when my need to transport the compost bucket from my house to the office AND take the train collided and demanded resolution.

I live about 40 miles from my downtown LA office. As often as possible, I take the train to Union Station, transfer to the subway, and emerge about a five-minute walk from the office. WHEN I don’t have to drive out of the transit zone for a meeting OR work past traditional quitting time, I prefer this schema. Then there’s the situation with the compost bucket. Seriously. Up until this week, I always rationalized that I’d have to drive on compost day because I couldn’t really take the bucket home on the train.

So this requires some back story, does it? OK, then. When I quaffed the green koolaid (maybe it was an environmental absinthe?) sometime back and took the lead in pulling my office along to more sustainable awareness and practice, both corporately and personally, a very natural (pardon the pun) extension for me was to collect the bio-degradable wastes from both our offices (I usually spend time in each on a weekly basis) and take them home for decomposition in my own composting operation.

(Cue the flashback music again.) You see, I’ve been organic in my home garden for nearly a decade, roughly since the time I released the “Chemlawn” people and decided there had to be a more planet- and cat-friendly way to take care of my landscape. Kitchen wastes, grass clippings, weeds—you name it, I learned to celebrate the science of decay, and how it could help my tiny slice of the universe. Granted, I’m a lazy composter—I only turn, water, screen, and so forth on an as-needed basis. What’s fabulous about this is that the natural process just keeps on keepin’ on, whether I really tend to it or not. All I can manage to do is speed it up.

Anyhow, back to the office waste. I bought some buckets with lids and encouraged my colleagues to contribute their non-processed food wastes, with the primary ingredient being the used coffee grounds (and filters) from our constantly dripping caffeine mills. In time, the devoted got the hang of it, and at the peak (before trimming staffs at both locations), I was carting home up to twenty-five pounds a week of prime carbon/nitrogen producing raw materials that otherwise would be now belching up methane in a landfill near you.

The process has been fantastic. The addition of the office green waste (including the trimmings from our plant maintenance people) has speeded up the action in my “high-volume” composting area, due largely to the fact that I have to turn and process it more often due to the accelerated anaerobic action of the increased kitchen wastes (um . . . it breaks down faster.) Now, of course, the tendency of this somewhat volatile process is that the decomposition really works on its own schedule, and, as you might expect, the buckets don’t care to sit around untended for any length of time. They really need to be emptied and replaced every week.

Which brings me back to the train deal. I know at the end of the day, it is more environmentally responsible for me to take the train to work. Furthermore, it’s generally more relaxing, as well, and takes most of the mystery out of the commute. So, faced with the choice of whether I should experiment and take the train on Friday, our half day, or drive the car so I could discreetly schlep home my festering coffee detritus, I have to admit I stewed on it for a while.

Then a brilliant idea struck! If I were to slip the bin into a generic kitchen waste bag, no one would know the wiser what was in it, (even if they could faintly detect the red lid through the walls of the 4 mil plastic bag), and it could rest conveniently in the aisle, like another innocuous wheely.

Today I am happy to report that the entire operation went off without a hitch. The wastes have been added to my compost piles, and the bucket is rinsed and ready to return tomorrow for another week’s collection, and I will take it with me on the train. I guess I should be glad people are probably shy to ask what it is.

So you may be asking, “What could this possibly have to do with multifamily housing.” Stay tuned.

(Daniel Gehman is principal at Thomas Cox Architects. He can be reached at DanielG@tca-arch.com)

© 2011 MHN Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Yardi  |   Point2  |   Multihousing News  |   Commercial Property Executive  |   RENTCafe  |   YES Energy Management  |   PropertyShark  |   RentGrow  |   Visual Homes  |   SiteStuff  |   Point2 Property Manager  |   ScreeningWorks  |   ResidentShield