A whirlwind of actions under the new Obama Administration. In quick succession, in the space of a little more than seven days, we have seen the following developments:

(1.) Feb. 10: The announcement by Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner of the White House’s financial rescue effort, the Financial Stability Plan, that will involve using the remaining $350 billion from TARP, and the employment of as much as $2.5 trillion in total;

(2.) Feb. 17: the signing by President Obama of the $787 billion economic stimulus bill, The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act;

(3.) Feb. 18: President Obama’s announcement of the $275 billion housing foreclosure alleviation plan, Housing Affordability and Stability Plan, to help lower interest rates for as many as seven to nine million homeowners. 

The implications for multifamily housing are varied. This issue of Multi-Housing Finance and Investment provide a number of reports on this subject. In short, (1.) The Financial Stability Plan expands TALF (Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility) to include the purchase of CMBS—which is a good thing from the point of view of multifamily financing.

(2.) The economic stimulus plan includes, according to the National Association of Home Builders: certain favorable provisions for the Low Income Housing Tax Credit and New Markets Tax Credit programs; additional appropriations for Section 8 project-based, CDBG, and HOME programs; and increases in FHA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loan limits.

And although this stimulus act is something of a half-measure in terms of its adoption of homebuyer tax credit proposals to help jump start the housing market, the National Association of Realtors says it can cause a “quick lift” in home sales this buying season. (Good news for condos, not so good news for apartments.)

(3.) Finally, from the housing industry point of view, the Housing Affordability and Stability Plan is both commended for heading off millions of foreclosures, and taken to task for ignoring renters, who make up a critical part of the housing market, or focusing too much on keeping people in their homes. 

(Keat Foong is the executive editor of Multi-Housing News)

“I’ve learned more in my lifetime, than you’ll probably ever know, because, wait, what were we talking about?”–My Grandfather, 1964

There is a lot of interest in multi-housing for all of the sectors, but lately there have been some great questions on continuing care retirement communities and nursing facilities. The biggest difference, as the claim goes, between market-rate and seniors housing is that teenagers are easier to handle than seniors.

A friend of mine, an investor in businesses that serve the multi-housing industry, helped put a movie deal together not too long ago and now, if you happen to live in Florida or have family there, the movie is making its debut. Now you might think I’m suggesting this because they’re paying me. They are not. You might think this movie is being recommended because I get to star in the sequel, which is also not true. I did hope that if they do a sequel I’d get to play someone commensurate with my vast acting experience, for example, I’d be a good dead guy on the slab at the morgue. No lines, and all I have to do, is not breathe when the camera is on me. I’d also be good in a crowd scene, where I’m standing next to some supermodels. Since that won’t ever happen in real life, maybe it can be scripted.

But actually, I want you to tell your friends and grandparents and grapefruit league followers to see this movie because it will give you a good command of the thoughts and feelings of our seniors. If you’re building for this market niche and want to learn more about who they are and what they want, watch this film. The fact that it stars everyone’s favorite ‘Dad’, Andy Griffith, and wonder actor and Uber Mom Doris Roberts, who played Marie Barone on ‘Everyone Loves Raymond,’ is a real benefit.

As an added plus, if the movie does well, you’ll have played a part in helping launch it and best of all, the next generation of senior congregate care housing will be much improved.

Click here to watch the movie trailer or here to find a theater in Florida.

With any luck at all, you’ll see me in the remake in about 30 years!

(Jack Kern is the managing director of Kern Investment Research, a firm that has nothing to do with the movie industry. He asks: How come they can’t make popcorn that won’t stain your shirt when you drop it? I know, the obvious answer is don’t drop the popcorn, but then it’s harder to watch the movie. If you watch the film, please write and tell me how you liked it. JKern@KernIRC.com or call 301-601-900.)


For those of you who have never been stuck in a vehicle, whether in mud or, more likely in snow, this concept may be a little hard to grasp. However, anyone who has been through this experience will recognize that astonishingly satisfying moment when your wheels finally grip something with a bit more bite than whatever mush you’ve been digging through, and do the expected job of propelling you forward.

I had an indelible traction moment this week, and it has to do with one of my pet interests: the “greening” of multifamily residential projects. This is the same week that the combined NAHB/NMHC (finally) released their National Green Building Standards. We in the multifamily industry have been waiting for this code for a long time. Let the celebration begin! In short, the prescriptive document tilts somewhat in the favor of multifamily projects when it comes to achieving a noteworthy score of bronze, silver, gold, or “emerald,” the highest honor bestowed upon a development by the NGBS.

But the traction I sensed doesn’t really have to do with the NGBS, though it is a welcome addition to the toolbox. No, the traction I’m thinking of has to do with what I call “Sustainability 2.0”, that is, the pursuit of higher performance buildings (a term I prefer to “sustainable”—but that’s for another post) for the sake of the bottom line. Saving money, I have asserted previously and will undoubtedly do again, must be the real catalyst for developers to “drink the KoolAid” of new green standards for dense development.

In this week’s case, it comes down to renewable energy generated on site. Yes, folks, I’m referring to photo-voltaic panels employed to generate a certain amount of a project’s power demands. In the interests of full disclosure, I’m coming from the perspective of a true believer AND an early adapter. Just over two years ago, I flipped the switch to a 4.3 KW PV system on my roof and began generating about 85% of my annual electricity usage. (BTW, I’d like to thank those of you who contributed to the cause, as I received both state and federal tax credits for this effort, in addition to a generous rebate from the California Energy Commission.) Also, for those of you who are keeping track, I’m saving about a half ton of GHG emissions every month—anyone looking to purchase carbon offsets should contact me.

But back to the point. I’ve been trying to encourage my clients to incorporate PV into their multifamily structures to offset the house loads—that’s it. This is not generally attractive to the developers of for-sale product, but to those who build and HOLD assets, often for 25 years or more, this is a big deal. When I bought my system for my house, I did so as much to bring credence to my passion as to contribute to my household’s bottom line. It is substantially easier to have a discussion about the benefits of site-generated energy when I’m doing it myself. Anyway, at today’s prices, with rebates, incentives, and tax credits all rolled in, a multifamily developer might rationally expect to re-coup the costs of a PV system in somewhere between 6 and 10 years. That, my friends, computes to money in the bank. But better than that, if the cost advantages lead to a proliferation of these systems on multifamily projects, the benefits to our environment will begin to accrue at what will soon become an estimable rate.

At this very moment, one of my clients is seriously considering PV systems, both for their existing properties, as well as a new one I’m designing. That we are seriously engaging in the discussion and exploration is nearly a point of euphoria for me, as it portends a greater trend in the industry—to seek out high performance solutions because they make sense.

Notice how I haven’t even mentioned the points that might be achieved on a “green” scorecard? That’s because, at the end of the day, the scorecards have served a mostly pedagogical intention: to demonstrate what might be achieved for the good of everyone through the foresight and conviction of a select few. But let’s move on to the next phase—greening for “green” ($), just like my mother (God rest her soul) taught me.

Over the next few years, as we climb out of this funk, we will build more apartments, and they will be snapped up due to the demand that is building even as you read this post. We will re-double our efforts as designers to unearth every high performance strategy at our disposal to lessen our dependence on foreign oil, provide healthier environments for our residents, craft better urban environments, nurture more cohesive communities, and do all of this with an eye to the bottom line—because at the end of the day, we do know which side the bread is buttered on.

(Daniel Gehman is principal at Thomas Cox Architects)

“And now, of course this is another thing I didn’t count on, that now as the Governor of the state of California, I am selling California worldwide. You see that? Selling.” Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, State of California

With little fanfare and a huge amount of criticism, the state of California is suffering in an unprecedented way. With budget shortfalls estimated as high as $42 billion dollars, the state announced recently that approximately 20,000 employees could be furloughed and countless other projects in process, including the construction of bridges and roads, will be stopped completely. The unavoidable conclusion from all of this is that Schwarzenegger’s comments about selling California may have become prophetic. Even with the prospect of a new budget bill under consideration by the state Senate, it is very probable that mass layoffs will take place, and future layoffs aren’t off the table. A budget bill intended to forestall this unprecedented personnel action may help avoid those measures now, but it is only a matter of time before the state succumbs to the financial pressures that cause it to wreak havoc on an already severely depressed economy. With economic power in California rivaling many small countries, demise of adequate state funding will have a ripple effect. It may mean additional privatization of state owned facilities, delays in paying income tax refunds and loss of massive amounts of future investor capital.

It’s also pushing apartment rents to low levels not seen in the past ten years in many primary markets. The complete evaporation of demand in both northern and southern California has begun to show up with properties offering reduced rents, higher levels of concessions and better terms overall. Property owners with major operations in the state can expect to see deteriorating fundamentals as the state collapses, and even with TARP II and other federal bailouts, there isn’t a $42 billion solution that will allow Arnold to balance the books.

Most pundits are fond of making fun of the governator, as he’s called, but his tagline now begs the question: “I’ll be back.”

I’m not so sure.

(Jack Kern is the Managing Director of Kern Investment Research and will be participating on a panel at the NAHB Pillars in San Diego. Please stop over and say hello if you happen to attend. He’d love to meet you and chat.)

 


Because of my friendship with the director of the ULI Los Angeles Chapter, I was invited to the presentation of the executive summary of the ULI National Advisory Panel’s charrette on the Jordan Downs community and greater surrounding area of Watts. Those of you non-Angelenos may recall this storied community as the flashpoint of the 1965 riots in Los Angeles. It is also, incidentally, the birth place of the infamous LA gang known as the “Crips.”

In what was ultimately a wonderfully optimistic program, a couple of things struck me. Among the recommendations of the Advisory Panel, which consisted of national experts on this kind of community planning, were:

  1. That the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (HACLA) identify A SINGLE PERSON TO ACT AS THE LEADER OF THE OVERALL REHABILATION EFFORT (the Redevelopment “Czar”, if you will);
  2. That HACLA partner with A FOR-PROFIT DEVELOPER for the redevelopment effort (and not just a consultant), and
  3. That the community be RE-BRANDED.

Wow. This, naturally, got my attention as I have already drunk the Kool-Aid of the idea of public-private partnerships being necessary to provide any kind of affordable housing throughout our region, and probably nationally as well. But what really got my engines running was the intricate balance suggested between the government and a private entity driven by a profit motive. As I’ve said before, I believe this model is the only one by which we will successfully produce the vast amount of housing necessary to accommodate the “working class.”

In the prescriptions for the resurrection of Jordan Downs, it was suggested by ULI that the city adopt a mentality that reflected private development—namely, that ONE INDIVIDUAL be CLEARLY in charge of the overall effort. Forgive me, but I conceive of this as the “Peter Ueberroth” effect—that a single, focused, motivated individual, through the sheer power of will, can align vast teams of people to carry out the tasks to bring the vision to reality. (Speaking of PU, should I mention California’s current “governator” will be termed out in 2010? Mr. Ueberroth, are you listening?)

Next, the panel also recommended that a private, for-profit developer PARTNER with HACLA to undertake the renaissance of Jordan Downs. This is significant for the simple, clear suggestion that the calcified City bureaucracy is not quite up to handling what will be the labyrinthine issues that will dog the effort; it will require a near Quixote character, ready to tilt at the windmills of small thinking, territoriality, and irrational competition.

What a wonderful mix—a strong, independent, forceful leader on the City’s side matched with an entrepreneurial, spirited, visionary capitalist captain from the private realm, teaming to forge solutions to the utterly intractable predicament of one of LA’s most notorious neighborhoods.

This, I believe, is the picture of the future. Will such a match be made? Is it possible? Keep your eyes peeled. ULI may have kick-started the future, in the unlikeliest of places—Jordan Downs, Watts, Los Angeles. Perhaps with the passage of President Obama’s stimulus package, the tide will turn, even if only for a mercurial moment, in favor of this neediest of communities.

Hope and change, indeed.

(Daniel Gehman is principal at Thomas Cox Architects)

“It was impossible to get a conversation going; everybody was talking too much.”

Yogi Berra

I’m an average sports fan. I like some sports more than others and for the most part, find fun in just about everything. Even NASCAR ( continuous left turns for 500 miles at Beltway speeds) is a lot more interesting since I found a Chevy hat while recently walking my dog. At least I can sit on the sofa, wear my Chevy hat and call my dog Bo. That’s not her name, but if I’m eating something I’ll call her and she’ll come over to see what I’m doing.

The one sport I’m finding I’m not much of a fan of is politics. Recently, there have been a lot of baseball analogies about how the prez is coming up to bat, or the economy isn’t even in the 3rd inning yet and other references. From my vantage point, politics is alot like sitting at the ball park during a rain delay. You know that if you just wait long enough, something, anything has to happen. The outcome won’t always please you or your buddies, but there will be a result. I used to see famed columnist George Will at Baltimore Oriole baseball games. He was sitting there eating hot dogs (he really eats a lot of hot dogs) and entertaining some luminary from sports or television. I was just try to keep from getting mustard on my shirt. What George and I shared was a love of the possibility, that somehow the players could put together a win. We were frequently disappointed, not only by the team, but by the laundry bills.

What I find fascinating is how the game is played these days. The dynamic is really kind of funny. Picture this, you have an election and the democrats win by a landslide. They eventually win control in the Congress and have a democratic prez and now the fun starts. The democrats pitch the ball, and the prez gets called out on strikes. The prez bunts and gets thrown out at first. Remember, these are his own players. The prez finally bulks up a bit on pork (which is every politician’s steroid) and the thing next you know, he’s running the bases like an olympic sprinter.

In an economy where the recession is causing the most pronounced softness in rents and occupancies we’ve seen in many years, and every facet of the business world that contributes to GDP is suffering, we still have this political game in Washington, where someone has to win. The republicans are proudly standing their ground while their states are mired in disaster and the democrats are still playing the tax and spend symphony. It’s hard, to paraphrase Yogi, to get something going where the sides will listen to each other. I’m hopeful that this year will bring increased consumer confidence and employment, but until then, we may just witness the democratic party destroying itself in the name of doing what’s right.

I’d buy a ticket to that.

(Jack Kern used to play baseball as a kid and then decided working in the apartment industry was a better calling. He is the managing director of Kern Investment Research and can reached at JKern@KernIRC.com or 301-601-1900.)

Clemenza: You know any good-a spots on the west side?
Paulie Gatto: Yeah, I’ll think about it.
Clemenza: Well, think about it while you’re driving, will ya? I wanna hit New York sometime this month.
(c) The Godfather 1972
 

The effect of job loss is evident in New York. One friend of mine has a foolproof measure of the economic health of the city; how long does it take to get a taxi in the city. Time was, the streets were jammed with cars, traffic didn’t move and taxis were almost universally full. Now, a simple wave gets you a taxi in most parts of the city.

There are closed restaurants and shops all over the city, lots of ground floor retail with for lease signs and still some signs of construction, but as it was forecast just at the end of 2007, New York is showing signs of an urban recession. On a recent trip to the city, things have gotten so bad that the famed Metropolitan Opera announced it was laying off about 10% of its staff (it didn’t mention any mezzo soprano or tenors). Question: what do unemployed sopranos do when they lose their jobs?

In what is a contrary practice to the usual NYC behaviors, you can actually find apartments now in the city. There are more and more for lease signs in windows and while the full complement of Wall Streeters haven’t all left the city, job losses in the region estimated at almost 300,000 over the past 2 years are pushing NYC back to the 1980s, when the bond crisis and urban instability was the nightly news. When you go into restaurants or even local carry-outs, the line of customers is vastly shorter, and hotel rates have declined by almost $200 a night in some places to where a room at a satisfactory hotel is under $150.

I happened to stay in a place that was populated by a convention of Chinese and Korean nationals. I never found out what the meeting concerned, and I didn’t understand a single conversation in the elevators either. I also discovered, oh about every 7 or 8 minutes that my hotel was on the same block with an active fire house and a police precinct. The do love their horns and sirens in NYC. I never looked at an alarm clock in hotel room so many times before.

While I was watching the political theatre that is Tim Geithner, it did occur to me that New York has become a city in need, with massive repercussions from the collapse of investment banking firms, with concerns about TARP and TALF and maybe two trillion or more in spending, there is a reality in the city that is hard to ignore. Lives were disrupted in the city and part of what makes New York great was lost.

Congress likes to make speeches about small towns in Indiana or Wisconsin that need to be re-built and have their employment base somehow restored. It might be hard to get sympathy for New York, but in the end, it’s important to the economy of the U.S. and hopefully some of the upcoming spending will be targeted to help sustain and grow Wall Street. I’d hate the see the belief that somehow Manhattan greed caused the recession (not true) color the reality of what’s happened to New York since the collapse.

Next time you’re in the city, stop by, talk to the street vendors and do your part to help the economy grow, even if it’s only one pretzel at a time.

(Jack Kern is the Managing Director of Kern Investment Research and can be reached at 301-601-1900 or JKern@KernIRC.com.)


Here are some “take away” items from the Mortgage Bankers Association’s annual commercial real estate financing conference, which I attended this week in San Diego. Yes, financing will be back, within two years.

That is the opinion of most of the financing industry members, some of them executives of leading players. We are talking about CMBS-like, securitized, financing in some form or other.

Indeed, during the conference Jones Lang LaSalle released its 2009 Loan Production Outlook Survey that showed 67 percent of nationwide commercial real estate lenders expect securitized lending to return to the capital markets by 2011. If some CMBS-like financing is once again available—remember how it heated up the multifamily markets?—it should, one would think, help boost apartment values at that time. Perhaps this will happen around 2011.

Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner’s just-announced proposal to expand government support under TALF (Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility) to the commercial real estate mortgage securities could help restore trading in the securities—and ultimately, prompt securitized lending once again.

However, securitized financing addresses only permanent or maybe even bridge financing, but not construction lending, which may remain unavailable for the foreseeable future. Many lenders at the meeting were upfront about the current unavailability of capital. Most life companies seem to have stopped lending to the commercial real estate sector, or at least dramatically curtailed on their lending. As far as banks, one panelist at the conference lamented that the bigger national commercial banks are out of active balance sheet lending to the sector, but so are the smaller community banks who should be able to pick up some of the slack.

Another major concern of the multifamily industry is the financing industry’s ability to refinance the huge volume of loans maturing in the next few years. Given the current credit crunch, a refinancing crisis seems to be in the making. On this issue, Jami Woodwell, MBA vice president of commercial real estate research, noted at a press luncheon that longer-term fixed-rate loans that are maturing may have it easier than the huge volume of maturing short-term loans. That’s because such loans have gone through a longer period of price appreciation and amortization and were likely made in the early 2000s—before the height of the market.

Of course, the multifamily sector is in far better shape than other commercial real estate sectors by dint of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac financing that is made available to it—for now. Throwing a shadow over multifamily financing in the minds of many, however, is the GSEs’ impending mandated reduction in portfolio in 2010—when they may have to reduce their multifamily financing volume.

With regards to this question, Fannie Mae said it is pushing more and more of its multifamily financing over to securitization. If the loans are securitized and sold to investors, rather than held in portfolio, they would not be subject to the portfolio limits. Let’s hope that works and liquidity remains in the multifamily sector. 

Last but not least, the lenders sure are aware of softening fundamentals in the apartment sector. On a multifamily financing panel, executives, including ones from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, told the moderator Shekar Narasimhan that they expect apartment values to decline from 12 to 20 percent this year.

And, take note, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have tightened their underwriting standards in the past few weeks. Heidi McKibben, Fannie Mae vice president, multifamily, told MHN that job loss is leading to higher vacancies and reductions in NOI. For example, in California occupancies have fallen from about 95 to low-90 percent, she noted. “It is important to have structures in place to ensure that [Fannie Mae] is not overlending,” she told MHN.

For detailed reports on these topics, tune in to daily issues of Multi-Housing News e-newsletters this week—or the next issue of Multi-Housing Finance and Investment in two weeks’ time. See you then.

As top financial executives come to Washington hat in hand to appear before the House Financial Services Committee, they have some explaining to do. Since taking hold of hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer aid under the Trouble Asset Relief Program (TARP) last fall, the firms have come under heavy scrutiny for using the funds for purposes other than lending, including junkets and massive bonuses to top brass. Now, before handing out the remainder of the TARP funds, the Treasury is re-jiggering the program strategy and Congress is making banks eat a little crow on behalf of the American taxpayer.

Speaking of taxpayers, it looks as though the financial stimulus is nearing the end of its contentious run through Congress, with House and Senate negotiators having trimmed the bill to some $790 billion. Each chamber passed a different version of the bill, and it now must be reconciled into one package. A key aspect of the negotiations is keeping happy the three moderate Republicans—Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, along with Maine’s Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe—who crossed party lines to vote for the Senate bill, the only Republicans to vote for the bill in either house. President Obama has said he wants some version of the bill on his desk for signing by Monday.

Meanwhile, the U.S. budget deficit continues to grow, jumping by $83.8 billion in January. The increase brings the total deficit for the first four months of the fiscal year to $569 billion. By way of comparison, 2008’s first four fiscal months saw a surplus of $89 billion. The government’s massive efforts to stabilize the financial system and jump start the economy account for most of the shortfall, combined with dwindling tax revenue as corporate profits plummet and the employment sector hemorrhages jobs. And it’s only going to get worse; economists predict the deficit to continue to grow throughout the year, with the Congressional Budget office projecting a $1.2 trillion hole for all of fiscal 2009.

In the single-family home market, demand for mortgage applications dipped by nearly 25 percent last week, sinking to an eight-year low, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. Aside from much tighter credit restrictions and a lower overall availability of mortgages, prospective buyers who would qualify for a home loam are remaining on the sidelines waiting to get in at the bottom as prices and interest rates continue to drop. Home prices are off at least 25 percent from their peak of mid-2006 and rates are still sinking. Additionally, the Treasury Department has proposed injecting funds into the housing market to lower rates further and provide a $15,000 home-buying tax credit. For now, it seems those who are inclined to jump back into the housing market are waiting for the best possible time to do so.

(Adam Perrota is a news writer with Commercial Property News, an MHN' sister publication)


Governor Le Petomane: ” …We’ve got to protect our phony baloney jobs, gentlemen. We must do something about this, immediately, immediately, immediately!”

Blazing Saddles, nominated for an Oscar in 1975
(c) Mel Brooks, Warner Bros. Pictures 1974

The World According to TARP, as it’s now known, has been fraught with an overwhelming sense of failure. One of the key distinctions between how economic stimulus is supposed to work and the reality of its effect is becoming more evident every day. Remembering our earlier example, in the far reaching poppy fields of OZ, Dorothy and her cohorts (ever notice how much the Lion looks like Dick Cheney?) are just waking up from the roadside to discover new subdivisions built all over the place, the Yellow Brick Road is now a 4 lane divided highway, (TARP funds no doubt) but an eerily quiet pervades the landscape. Few of the houses are now occupied, the OZ Medical Center is mostly empty and lots of munchkins have been layed off from their jobs. (OZ was a major exporter of flowers and children’s clothes). Even the witches castle is now a converted Denny’s but business is slow. Crime is up, and now the town council is hoping that TARP II, return of the Phantom Finance is coming soon.

The Treasury Department, under Henry, “What me worry?” Paulson has squandered what could have been a major opportunity to make a difference and now about half of the funds Congress voted for TARP are mis-spent to such an extend that the Inspector General is reporting the deals made were terribly unfair to taxpayers. President Obama is now planning to unleash the next phase of TARP, probably followed up by additional spending in the future. By some estimates, if you add up all of the funds spent on stimulus so far, from all Federal sources, the real number, based on every initiative apparently exceeds $7 trillion.

So why isn’t it working?.

There is little doubt that this economic recession is severe enough to warrant taking some action, but there are concerns here that seem to be missed by the economic reporters in the press, save for Steve Liesman, of CNBC who gets it, but doesn’t get enough time on camera.

This is a global recession, one that won’t simply respond to a U.S. based stimulus package. There isn’t enough finance in our capitalistic system to make the major nations change their ways or recover any faster. China is a risk, because their own stimulus packages are failing and that nation may become destabilized to such an extent that a rising rural populace, upset about the few in coastal areas with adequate housing and food may revolt. A revolution is China, despite our ideological differences is not a good thing right now, but it is a real possibility. Riots have already broken out over closed factories and food shortages.

The European Union is suffering under not only the crushing weight of some freak snowstorms, but also under the cold reality of an economy that has slowed dramatically across almost all nations, and even little Norway, Sweden and Finland find their banking systems at risk.

TARP may help somewhat, but it isn’t the solution, and don’t count on our trading partners to be in any better shape, to buy our goods or invest here. Levels of foreign direct investment and trade finance will continue to decline over the foreseeable future.

The economic stimulus programs offered up by the new economic counselors to the Prez have many elements that are long on traditional solutions, monetary re-balancing, deleveraging of asset classes, reinforcing confidence in banks, but short on what is sorely needed; direct benefits to taxpayers. While restoring some 3 million jobs is the plan, and the ancillary benefits and the multiplier effect on other sectors is unquestionably sound, individuals need to  have confidence restored and a willingness to start spending again. One current proposal, which I support, is to allow for Federally insured 4% mortgages, which would help alleviate the housing crisis and move the inventory of foreclosed and real estate owned houses off the balance sheets of banks. That might be a funny thing to approve of for a die-hard apartment guy, but we have to face the reality of how this housing market is impacting rentals and support the absorption of these unsold units or we’ll face even more rental competition.

Like Governor Petomane, in Blazing Saddles, the phony baloney jobs that Treasury officials hold need to be turned into effective stewards of our tax dollars, or the next GDP report will show even larger losses and job cuts will start to approach 4 million, instead of settling down over the 3 million mark so far. As TARP II makes it way through the Congress, the likely benefit of the diversity of spending in the bill should have the immediate impact of starting spending again. Issues with pork style projects abound, but at least something will finally begin in earnest.

(Jack Kern is the Managing Director of Kern Investment Research and can be reached at 301-601-1900 or JKern@KernIRC.com.)

© 2011 MHN Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha

Yardi  |   Point2  |   Multihousing News  |   Commercial Property Executive  |   RENTCafe  |   YES Energy Management  |   PropertyShark  |   RentGrow  |   Visual Homes  |   SiteStuff  |   Point2 Property Manager  |   ScreeningWorks  |   ResidentShield